<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardians at the Wikipedia Gate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pointsofreference.booklistonline.com/2009/08/25/guardians-at-the-wikipedia-gate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pointsofreference.booklistonline.com/2009/08/25/guardians-at-the-wikipedia-gate/</link>
	<description>Front-line experts write about reference sources and trends in reference publishing and services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:35:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Bunch</title>
		<link>http://pointsofreference.booklistonline.com/2009/08/25/guardians-at-the-wikipedia-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Bunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pointsofreference.booklistonline.com/?p=654#comment-287</guid>
		<description>I read the article this morning, too.  I even considered blogging about it, but I&#039;m glad you did.  I love Wikipedia, despite its (sometimes) unreliability. I&#039;m glad the Wikipedia editors are exerting more editorial control, despite the fact that Wikipedia then becomes less of an encyclopedia that everyone can contribute to on relatively equal terms.  I guess I&#039;d rather see the world&#039;s largest encyclopedia be more authoritative rather than more democratic.  I use Wikipedia frequently, most recently last night to look up the photographer Thomas Joshua Cooper.  The entry compared favorably with Cooper&#039;s bio on the Pace Wildenstein website.   Each complemented the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the article this morning, too.  I even considered blogging about it, but I&#8217;m glad you did.  I love Wikipedia, despite its (sometimes) unreliability. I&#8217;m glad the Wikipedia editors are exerting more editorial control, despite the fact that Wikipedia then becomes less of an encyclopedia that everyone can contribute to on relatively equal terms.  I guess I&#8217;d rather see the world&#8217;s largest encyclopedia be more authoritative rather than more democratic.  I use Wikipedia frequently, most recently last night to look up the photographer Thomas Joshua Cooper.  The entry compared favorably with Cooper&#8217;s bio on the Pace Wildenstein website.   Each complemented the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

